I need to replace this light-bulb. It is very slim and I have never seen it anywhere else. What is the light bulb's type?
2 Answers
Looks like a Linear Halogen R7s but you need to measure it to get the right length eg 78mm/118mm.
- 226
- 2
- 3
-
5Wipe off the glass part after installing the new one. Your body oils will cause premature failure because of the extreme heat generated by these bulbs. – JACK Oct 05 '19 at 11:49
-
7If you accidentally touch the bulb while handling it, don't just wipe it off with a rag or something. Use a clean rag/towel/etc. and some anhydrous (99%) rubbing alcohol, to make 100% sure there's no trace of oil left. But really, just make sure you only handle the bulb with a clean cloth and don't actually touch it in the first place. – Peter Duniho Oct 05 '19 at 18:02
-
5It's actually salt (sodium chloride) not oils that gets into the quartz (silica) envelope and causes it to weaken and fail, so wear clean gloves, and wash it if you accidentally touch it. – Jasen Oct 06 '19 at 01:07
There is no doubt that is a halogen tube style bulb. These types of bulbs have a risk to them; they get extremely hot, and can start fires.
Unless the socket can be changed to another bulb type, I advise discarding this entire fixture and replacing with LED. Aside from the higher fire risk, they also are quite inefficient. This 100W lamp replaces about 140W of incandescent, but a 20W CFL will replace it, as will a 15W LED. Your local power company may well have incentives/rebates/bounties for the elimination of such lights, because paying you to get rid of such fixtures is actually cheaper for them than building out the power plant capacity to power it.
My rule of thumb on energy use is $1/watt/year for a load on 24x7 (like that cable box), assuming 12 cents a KWH. A load on a fraction of the time is that fraction of $1. I.E. A bathroom light that might be on 10% of the time, saving 85 watts means saving $85 x 10% = $8.50/year.
- 300,628
- 26
- 286
- 734
-
5Incandescent light bulbs are no longer sold in the EU because of their inefficiency, with some exceptions. Pressurized halogen bulbs are one of the exceptions - they aren't as efficient as LED, but they are not that bad. – Martin Bonner supports Monica Oct 05 '19 at 15:31
-
4@MartinBonner Generally all the exceptions are because there is no alternative, e.g. Oven lights or the difficulty of putting any alternative technology in the very small space of a halogen tube bulb. That is why I say junk the fixture. ...yes, we have "60 watt" equivalent halogens that are 45 watts. The "60 watt" CFLs were 11 watts The "60 watt" LEDs are 7. – Harper - Reinstate Monica Oct 05 '19 at 15:41
-
It's not terribly hard to convert many halogen lamps to standard screw in type bulb sockets. I've done it with several of my old Torchiere lamps. You'll have to buy the new socket. Changes to switching is usually not necessary. Once done, you can put an LED in there. – Wayfaring Stranger Oct 05 '19 at 16:35
-
-
11You're being overly alarmist about Halogen bulbs. People have been using them for... what, 40 or 50 years now, all over the world. Yes, they can theoretically shatter. That's why you don't just put them at arm's reach. Yes, they're not efficient like CFLs or LEDs, but - OP shouldn't replace a series of light fixtures because of this consideration. – einpoklum Oct 05 '19 at 21:55
-
@einpoklum The problem is not just shattering. They run very hot and are therefore a huge fire hazard even when functioning as designed. There was a big thing I remember many years back to provide free metal grids to put on top - to me that was a signal of just how dangerous these things are. I had a couple and got rid of them. Here is a link https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11020053 to a published medical journal article - that's how bad these things got! – manassehkatz-Moving 2 Codidact Oct 06 '19 at 02:39
-
As someone who switched mostly to CFL/LED 15 years ago... I have to note that you failed to put scare quotes around "equivalent". It's only in the last 3 or so that LEDs have acquired a CRE to be a competent replacement. – chrylis -cautiouslyoptimistic- Oct 06 '19 at 03:15
-
2@manassehkatz: They run hot, true. That doesn't make them a "huge fire hazard"; that depends on where and how they're installed - and usually they're installed in such a way that effectively, they aren't a significant hazard. – einpoklum Oct 06 '19 at 05:48
-
3@einpoklum Installed in an oven or other fixed appliance - great. Installed in an undercabinet fixture - OK. Installed in a portable torchiere, easily knocked down by kids or pets, easily placed next to draperies, etc. not so good. – manassehkatz-Moving 2 Codidact Oct 06 '19 at 05:49
-
2@manassehkatz : Fair enough about torchiere. OP's photo seems to be a wall-mounted fixture though. – einpoklum Oct 06 '19 at 08:19
-
In the house, lighting is not usually responsible for a very big chunck of electricity use, so, making "your meter spin like a top" is hyperbolic nonsense, even with halogens. – Oct 07 '19 at 03:20
-
1@fredsbend Alright, you sold me. I backed way off. I'm leaving the part about power plants in, though; that part is undisputable. – Harper - Reinstate Monica Oct 07 '19 at 04:32
-
@einpoklum alright, I've toned it back significantly. – Harper - Reinstate Monica Oct 07 '19 at 04:33
-
You can get LED bulbs that will slot into a fixture like this (e.g. this one from Philips. They work but may be more expensive and less bright than a new LED fixture. – Carl Oct 07 '19 at 13:14

ce-check.euhas no affiliation with the EU, but is the website of a consultancy company. The whole "China export" thing makes zero sense: there is no motivation whatsoever for a Chinese company to put a marking on a product that says "This is a safe, CE-marked product" to the general public but "This is a fake CE mark" to people in the know. Why would they do that, instead of putting the correct CE logo on the product? It makes much more sense to assume that some companies know exactly what the symbol is supposed to look like and some don't. – David Richerby Oct 06 '19 at 15:44